Posted by Ethan Lawson on July 25, 2013 |
Photo from Model D Media
The city of Youngstown, Ohio has learned to embrace its shrinking population by downsizing its infrastructure. The Youngstown 2010 Plan, originally created in 2005 as a joint vision between the City of Youngstown and Youngstown State University, calls for sweeping changes in the city’s land use. Since the plan was implemented, the crime rate has fallen and businesses are once again starting to invest in Youngstown. There is still much improvement to be made in Youngstown, but this plan could serve as a model for other larger Rust Belt cities.
Posted by admin on July 01, 2013 |
Photo from Buzz Feed
The City of Detroit has been in the news lately, mostly in ways that make it seem like the city is beleaguered with one problem after another. A new emergency manager has been appointed who recently published a report of the City’s finances that makes the prospect of looming bankruptcy seem even greater. Then there are the ongoing issues of rising crime, declining population rolls, and failing city services. Yet, in spite of what you hear and read trumpeted daily, there are many individuals and organizations working quietly and tirelessly in local neighborhoods to improve life for residents and/or children. They realize the challenges to their beloved city, yet they continue to strive to make it better. This type of passion and commitment is what keeps hundreds of thousands of people living in Detroit. This is why people, young and old, continue to move into the city, hopeful that better days still are ahead. Along with support from political leaders, the business community and philanthropic community, these local champions are the ones that keep the city viable. In their honor, we invite you to take a second look at Detroit.
Posted by Jenna Chilingerian on June 26, 2013 |
Photo from Los Angeles Poverty Department
The visual arts have a profound effect on the cultural vitality of impoverished communities. In particular, artistic and cultural activity creates an emotional outlet for Skid Row community members, translating into a greater sense of empowerment for the community at large. For ten years the Los Angeles Poverty Department has incorporated visual arts through arts-based engagement within the Skid Row community. Recently, the Los Angeles Poverty Department partnered with the REEL Recovery Film Festival to launch Biggest Recovery Community Anywhere, a 3-day festival including performance, film, discussion, and fellowship.
Posted by magosto on March 07, 2013 |
The focus of city revitalization efforts and policy prescription as of late has increasingly been focused on young professionals— in order to cultivate creative talent and innovation. Cities and municipalities have funneled money into amenities generally associated to the needs of this population, hoping to attract and retain these young people. Though this is generally deemed a vital step in creating a vibrant, economically feasible city, the effect of the transient nature of this group on the stability of the neighborhoods has historically been considered negative. The most common argument points out that homeowners have an incentive to invest in their community—primarily due to permanence and the overall neighborhood’s effect on property values.
Posted by Mark Ebner on May 10, 2012 |
University Park Alliance recently celebrated their one year anniversary of integrating University of Akron with the downtown community surrounding it. The celebration hosted Jim Clifton, CEO of Gallup polling organization and author of The Coming Jobs War, who discussed his prediction that cities, universities, and local leaders will need to work together to achieve the next economic breakthrough. An Akron Beacon Journal article details early studies conducted in Akron show a direct yearly total impact of $2.5 billion within the area by the major institutions in the redevelopment area. Henry Cisneros, former Secretary of HUD and current member of CEOs for Cities Board of Directors, “cited Akron and UPA's efforts as an example of building on a university and city's strenghts.”
Posted by Shayna Pollock on March 02, 2012 | City Dividends
New geo-coded data from the Center for Neighborhood Technology on housing and transportation costs further affirms that living in dense, livable communities is economical. According to an article on Atlantic Cities, from 2000-2009, housing and transportation costs increased at nearly twice the rate of incomes for the average American. Yet, for those in housing efficient locations, transportation costs only increased by half. Additionally, the data shows that when including transportation in the analysis of affordable housing, the percentage of neighborhoods considered “affordable” drops from 76 percent to 28 percent. When considering this data, which has far reaching policy implications, more expensive housing in city centers may actually be the more affordable option.
Posted by Shayna Pollock on July 13, 2011 |
CEOs for Cities' Young and Restless, a body of research on the migration trends of the young, college-educated population, shows 24-35 year olds flocking to cities. The number of young adults living in close-in neighborhoods increased by 26 percent since 2000. Thus, it is no surprise that cities are seeing a resurgence of new residential construction that far outpaces that of the suburbs. New apartment communities are booming in high-density neighborhoods near the city core of many major US cities.
According to an article in The Seattle Times, the city of Seattle is home to 85 percent of the current apartment construction and 90 percent of apartment construction in the pipeline for the entire region. This building boom, the largest upswing since 1991, demonstrates that "developers, for the most part, are bypassing the suburbs."
Seattle is not alone. In DC, according…
Posted by Carol Coletta on June 10, 2010 |
James Chung of Reach Advisors had a big message for the Pacific Coast Builders Conference today: There is a serious mismatch between trade up housing inventory and demand. One reason is changing demographics. The peak age for trade up is 46, and Boomers have now passed that age. The next big wave of consumers won't get there until 2020. But when they do, they will want something very different. Gen X places less value on traditional housing characteristics. They put far more emphasis on community.
How do builders build community? For the traditional subdivison developer, the answer is programming and design. But in cities, programming and design of community are delivered by a much broader set of players -- the city, neighbors, strangers, service personnel, small business people, other developers, architects of the public realm. It's one of the wonderful, but unpredictable things about cities.
If Gen X really values community, this is one desire cities ought to be able to deliver with superiority.
For one charming example of community, take a look at "Here You Go!" This is a simple expression of community that one would remember for a lifetime.
Posted by Julia Klaiber on March 10, 2010 |
Our President and CEO Carol Coletta was in Dallas this week where she spoke of the shift in housing demands away from suburbia at the 11th annual meeting of the North Texas Housing Coalition. The leaders of the new economy ? the young, college-educated and highly mobile members of the 21st century workforce ? are increasingly urban dwellers. They seek high-density, inner-city living that fosters connectivity and diversity.
Posted by Carol Coletta on October 11, 2009 |
Seriously? McMansions are on the wane?
The trends seem to suggest that, yes, it's true. The median size of new houses in the U.S. shrank last year, reversing a decades-long trend. And this year, the trend continues, with houses nearly 200 square feet smaller than two years ago. Average new home size in the U.S. peaked in 2007 at 2521 square feet. And though home sizes are on the decline, U.S. homes are still much larger than those in Germany and France (1200 square feet) and in England (900 square feet).
Is America ready to trade off more private space for better public space? And if so, are urban leaders ready to respond?