tags
feeds
- rss
- atom
- what is a feed?
popular
- Bill Bishop on The Daily Show
- Highways and Bridges
- Audio of Call with White House's Strautmanis Available
- Not Surprised by Surprising Increase in City Dwellers
- ArtPrize from Above
Sign up for the re:think email newsletter.
archive
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
The Truth of Superstar Cities
February 19, 2007
Posted by: Carol
Reading today's news on New York's hot housing market, I had to reflect again on the puzzling op-ed piece on "The Myth of Superstar Cities" last week in The Wall Street Journal.
To our knowledge, no source of data would tell you with any accuracy the number of college-educated 25 to 34 year-olds in any city since 2000, but the piece insists that "over the past decade college-educated workers...now appear to be tilting to more affordable, family-friendly places." It goes on to assert the following: "Since 2000, Riverside, Phoenix, Las Vegas and Dallas all have been among the big net gainers. In contrast New York, Boston, L.A. and even the Bay Area, a big winner in the 1990s, appear to have become among the highest net losers."
If the author has any facts to support these claims, we wish he would share them with us. In fact, we wish his editors would have insisted on including them in the article so we could all be enlightened.
(Our trusted economist, Joe Cortright at Impresa Consulting, tells us that the Census does publish its estimates of college attainment for the adult population, although even these estimates, based on the American Community Survey, have a relatively wide margin of error, making it difficult to accurately state how much change there has been in one city relative to others since 2000.)
What is most puzzling of all is that Las Vegas actually ranks last among the top 50 metro areas in the percentage of college grads, and Riverside and Phoenix are not far behind. Attracting additional college grads is always a good thing for an economy, but you have to look at the base off which you calculate that growth to see the complete picture.
The notion that big cities in so-called blue states are filled with evil chablis and brie elites sure feels like trumped up class warfare.
What really matters is that cities and the metro regions they anchor are the engines of the U.S. economy. If cities don't succeed, neither does America. It's counterproductive to our national success to try to pit one city against another.

Heather B, February 20, 2007
Is it possible that the authors used IRS data?
Link: http://myvalleyadvocate.com/blogs/urbancompass
*Required fields (your email address will not be published)