tags
feeds
- rss
- atom
- what is a feed?
popular
- Bill Bishop on The Daily Show
- Highways and Bridges
- Audio of Call with White House's Strautmanis Available
- Not Surprised by Surprising Increase in City Dwellers
- ArtPrize from Above
Sign up for the re:think email newsletter.
archive
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
Say No to Student Taxes
November 16, 2009
Posted by: Carol
Pittsburgh Councilman and CEOs for Cities member Bill Peduto fired back at Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's plans to tax the city's college students to fill budget gaps. While the mayor is looking for new revenue, Councilman Peduto says this is not the place to get it. Here are his comments released this morning.
Missing the Mark - Taxing Students
Last week, Mayor Ravenstahl announced his 2010 Budget. The news centered on his plan to create a new tax to require all college/trade school/ theology (?) students to pay 1% of their gross tuition to the city. There are some serious problems to this idea. First, it is illegal. Pennsylvania municipalities do not have the authority to create new taxes - only the state legislature can approve such actions.
Second, it misses the mark. If the problem - throughout Pennsylvania, not just Pittsburgh - is that a limited number of older, host municipalities have a limited tax base because of lost revenue from hosting non-profits, then how is that solved by targeting students? The answer is - it's not.
Third, it sends the wrong message to those we are trying to lure/keep here to build a New Pittsburgh. There is something fundamentally wrong with a city that closes its libraries and taxes its students - it is a city that sells its future to pay-off its problems, not solve them. Fourth, it is a tax on a classification of people. Not only are we targeting people who are working to better their life (an anti-sin tax?) but we are setting a precedent of taxing people based on their classification.
Fifth, it is just a really bad idea - you might as well take all of the good will we received during the G20 and flush it down the drain. Last week, I requested that the ICA (The Oversight Board) meet immediately to approve or deny this budget. The agreement the city signed with the Oversight Board required them to approve a budget BEFORE it is presented to Council. There is no provision for "conditional-approval." These are the very same mistakes we made in 2003 - the same actions that created our budget mess. I have been working hard to find a better way to balance our budget and should have an announcement later this week.

There are no comments for this entry.
*Required fields (your email address will not be published)