tags
feeds
- rss
- atom
- what is a feed?
popular
- Bill Bishop on The Daily Show
- Highways and Bridges
- Audio of Call with White House's Strautmanis Available
- Not Surprised by Surprising Increase in City Dwellers
- ArtPrize from Above
Sign up for the re:think email newsletter.
archive
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
Matching Democracy to Media Reach
February 26, 2009
Posted by: Carol
Knight Foundation President and CEO Alberto Ibarguen's comments to the WeMedia conference just made my hair stand on end.
He pointed out that there is, for the first time, a disconnect between media reach and where democracy happens. While local newspapers and radio are disppearing, online media is worldwide. Anyone anywhere can participate and share news and information. But we elect our representatives from a geographically defined communities. The Knight Foundation has been exploring this growing disconnect with its grantmaking.
"If you can’t bend the virtual experience to the local or the geographically defined space, then we need to start a second phase of our work." And that phase, he said, will ask, How do you structure democracy in a virtual way that is not rooted to geography?
That is a provocative question, for sure. But underlying the question is the assumption that face-to-face contact doesn't matter (which, btw, calls into question this gathering at the University of Miami).
Can the Knight Foundation really believe that local communities don't matter? That just because media is or can be national or international scope, that online communities can be international, that our government must be, also?
Again, it's a fascinating thought experiment, but I sure hope he doesn't believe the underlying assumption.
Update: I was able to ask Alberto more about his comment, and he explained that he believes strongly that information and commonly shared information (and definitions) are fundamental to democracy. Therefore, media that delivers information must somehow match to the geography of democracy. I completely agree that good information and shared information are essential to good decision making of any sort. But I don't know that because the reach of media is broad it cannot still be matched to the information needs of local democracy.
(Alberto is also making the case that newspapers that aren't profitable should be converted to nonprofit status and owned by the community. Now that I completely agree with.)

There are no comments for this entry.
*Required fields (your email address will not be published)