tags
feeds
- rss
- atom
- what is a feed?
popular
- Bill Bishop on The Daily Show
- Highways and Bridges
- Audio of Call with White House's Strautmanis Available
- Not Surprised by Surprising Increase in City Dwellers
- ArtPrize from Above
Sign up for the re:think email newsletter.
archive
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
Eyes Wide Open
April 30, 2006
Posted by: Sheila
Amid all of the emotional and heartfelt tributes this week upon the death of legendary urbanist Jane Jacobs comes a critical view by Nicholai Ouroussoff in today's New York Times. It is titled, "Outgrowing Jane Jacobs." Ouroussoff contends that the pendulum has swung so dangerously in favor of her ideas that it has distorted the public's understanding of urban planning. Her complete rejection of modernism and the value of str0ng leadership and major infrastructure investment hurt more than help.
"Perhaps her legacy has been most damaged by those who continue to treat 'Death and Life' [of Great American Cities] as sacred text rather than as what it was: a heroic cri di coeur. Of those, the New Urbanists are most guilty; in many cases, they reduced her vision of corner hsops and busy streets to a superficial town formula that creates the illusion of urban diversity, but masks a stifling conformity at its core."
The answer, Ouroussoff contends, is not to discount the importance of Jacobs' attention to the "more delicate bonds that tie us to a community," but to remember the most important lesson she had to teach us: the ability to look at the city with eyes wide open, without rigid prejudices, will help us build better cities.

There are no comments for this entry.
*Required fields (your email address will not be published)