tags
feeds
- rss
- atom
- what is a feed?
popular
- Bill Bishop on The Daily Show
- Highways and Bridges
- Audio of Call with White House's Strautmanis Available
- Not Surprised by Surprising Increase in City Dwellers
- ArtPrize from Above
Sign up for the re:think email newsletter.
archive
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
Advice on City Building
December 19, 2008
Posted by: Carol
Paul O’Connor, former head of World Business Chicago and one of the smartest urbanists around, was my guest for a recent video conference. Paul always has provocative things to say. Reviewing my notes of our conversation tonight on a flight from LaGuardia to Chicago that I almost missed, I was stuck by these comments:
“The only moral justification for economic development is to grow the pie for everybody.” This was Paul’s response to my question about how Chicago’s large poor population affected economic development for the city and specifically World Business Chicago. How many guys in charge of building a city’s global reputation would even consider the moral justification of the job, let alone believe that his organization’s reason for being is to bring poor people into the mainstream?
“We have to turn what are now wasted assets into usable assets.” Paul has a very practical way of expressing what he believes ought to be the city’s reason for developing human capital.
“Branding is a vehicle to move a city from where it is aspires to be.” Oh, if only all cities thought of branding in this way.
“The danger in branding is to become overly prescriptive.”
“Branding is communication that motivates and localizes.”
“Every city needs to inventory its assets. What do you have? Talent, intellectual capital, business establishments, physical infrastructure and who is willing to step up?” Note that last item. Who is willing to step up? Leadership will less likely come from those with position than from those who are willing. Which relates to the next point…
“Young people have to be asked to participate in building the city. There is no more ‘born to the manor’ in urban leadership.” Of course, you wouldn’t know it from today’s politics, but his point is well made. If a city treats leadership as an exercise in family succession, it risks perpetuating the same tired culture. And, worse, it keeps new blood at bay.
“The smartest move Chicago made in the past 20 years was to rebuild its core as a fun place to live. That attracted the young people which subsequently changed downtown and Chicago.”
Wise advice on city-building.

There are no comments for this entry.
*Required fields (your email address will not be published)