tags
feeds
- rss
- atom
- what is a feed?
search
search
popular
archive
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
Obama Adds "Cities" to His Stump Speech
February 19, 2008
Posted by: Carol
I heard it. Senator Barack Obama had a nice mention of cities in his speech tonight in Houston, after another big win in Wisconsin.
The New York Times complained in an editorial this morning that presidential candidates aren't talking about "the nation's struggling cities." "The cities," they write, "have been the hardest hit as federal policies have failed or gone missing in education, housing, health care, jobs, transportation and environmental, to name a few."
Certainly, this Administration has not been friendly to cities, and there is no excuse for that, given that most Americans now live in cities and the metro areas they anchor. And certainly, in this campaign season, we've not heard many mentions of cities as an issue.
But isn't the economy an urban issue? Aren't good jobs an urban issue? What about a new energy policy? Isn't that an urban issue? Isn't health care an urban issue? Isn't minimum wage an urban issue? Aren't early childhood education and schools urban issues?
Maybe it's time for urban leaders to change the frame and change the way they talk about cities. Maybe it's time that we offer up cities as solutions to the problems voters identify with rather than as the problem (that, frankly, voters don't identify with)?
I've had the opportunity to be in direct and routine contact over the past five weeks with voters who have questions and advice on issues and strategies in these campaigns. In hundreds of calls from voters, not one -- not one -- has asked about cities.
For someone like me who is in the business of selling cities, I could take this as a real disappointment. Or I can take it as an opportunity to reframe the way we talk about cities to make them more relevant to voters.
Kudos to Senator Obama for mentioning cities in his speech tonight. And props to NYT for its advocacy.
But listening to a very wide mix of voters, I'm convinced we will have to find new and fresh ways to talk about cities and how we ought to be investing in them as a nation if we want to be effective in pressing our points.
More on this later....

There are no comments for this entry.