tags
feeds
- rss
- atom
- what is a feed?
search
search
popular
archive
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
Bikes Are Not Transportation?
August 23, 2007
Posted by: Carol
If you weren't paying attention, you may have missed the brief remarks U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters made to Gwen Ifill on PBS's Newshour regarding government spending on bike paths and trails. But her comments, which seem to insinuate that biking is not a form of transportation to be invested in, have bike proponents up in arms.
Here's part of the interview:
MARY PETERS: ... the level of earmarking has increased substantially over the last couple of decades in terms of the highway bill. The last highway bill that was passed, in the summer of 2005, contained over 6,000 of those marks, those specially designated projects. And the cost of those projects just in that bill alone was $24 billion, almost a tenth of the bill.
GWEN IFILL: Aren't many of those projects, even though they're special interest projects, aren't they roads and bridges, often?
MARY PETERS: Gwen, some of them are, but many of them are not. There are museums that are being built with that money, bike paths, trails, repairing lighthouses. Those are some of the kind of things that that money is being spent on, as opposed to our infrastructure.
The interview was a follow up to the tragic bridge collapse in Minneapolis. And as we posted here, that city's major daily paper penned an editorial on the need to rethink the region's transportation strategy to reduce wear and tear on roads through investments in transit.
Wouldn't encouraging people to bike to work also help with that problem?
Seems Mary Peters hasn't thought of it that way.
You can read the transcript from the full interview or watch it by clicking here.

Robin, August 24, 2007
While I don't claim to know what Ms. Peter's opinion of cycling for transportation is, as a bike commuter I agree that transportation funds should not be used for bike trails. Bike paths and trails are not for transportation, but are instead recreational and should be funded by Parks and rec departments. I would rather that funding for road infrastructure be used to improve bike access to roads eliminating everything from potholes to improperly installed sewer grates. These funds should also be used to bike education and as well as driver ed to increase awareness of the proper venue for bicycles, the road.